Skip to content

Conversation

@glaforge
Copy link
Contributor

@glaforge glaforge commented Aug 8, 2025

Fixes #325

In Python, the methods on contexts to handle the artifact service are on the callback_context class.
But somehow, in Java, the listArtifacts() method was in ToolContext instead, whereas, oddly, loadArtifact() and saveArtifact() were in CallbackContext.
That way, we align Java and Python, and bring listArtifacts() with the other artifact methods.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @glaforge, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've refactored the Java codebase to improve consistency with its Python counterpart regarding artifact service methods. Specifically, I've moved the listArtifacts() method from ToolContext to CallbackContext, consolidating all artifact-related operations within CallbackContext for better organization and alignment.

Highlights

  • Method Relocation: The listArtifacts() method has been moved from ToolContext to CallbackContext.
  • API Alignment: This change aligns the Java context classes with the Python implementation, where artifact service methods reside in the callback context.
  • Code Organization: All artifact-related methods (listArtifacts(), loadArtifact(), saveArtifact()) are now co-located within CallbackContext.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request successfully refactors the listArtifacts() method by moving it from ToolContext to its parent class CallbackContext. This change improves the API design by grouping all artifact-related methods together, aligning the Java code with its Python counterpart as intended. My review includes a suggestion to improve consistency within CallbackContext and a more critical point about updating the corresponding unit tests to reflect this refactoring.

@Poggecci
Copy link
Contributor

Poggecci commented Aug 8, 2025

Please fix the formatting and then commit history and then we're good to mark this as ready to pull

@glaforge glaforge requested a review from Poggecci August 8, 2025 20:13
@glaforge
Copy link
Contributor Author

glaforge commented Aug 8, 2025

Formatting and commit history should be fixed now, sorry!

Copy link
Contributor

@Poggecci Poggecci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this change

@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 5839f6c into google:main Aug 9, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move ToolContext#listArtifacts() in the parent CallbackContext

2 participants